Why Do I Think Bad Thoughts About My Family
Hollywood seems determined to profit from remakes and sequels that movie makers take no business writing, producing or releasing. Rather than working hard to generate new films — ones with novel plot devices, leads and stories from underrepresented communities and compelling cinematic visions, for instance — the bigwigs of the American movie industry are on a mission to speedily ruin any remnant of millennial childhood nostalgia.
So, it is with a heavy heart — and in recognition that January 10, 2021, marks 5 years since the passing of the absolutely legendary and incomparable David Bowie — that I am forced to address the announcement of a Labyrinth sequel. Now, does the original movie crave, necessitate or even hint at a sequel? Is the lead actor from the original motion-picture show prepared to make an appearance? Is the original director nevertheless bachelor? The answer to these questions is a single, resounding "NO." And withal, hither we are. Sigh.
Allow me to take a brief moment to discuss why a Labyrinth sequel is an awful, terrible, no-proficient thought.
A Bowie-Less Labyrinth Sequel Will Exist a Travesty
The upcoming Labyrinth sequel faces some tough challenges. For starters, it'southward going to be missing its eternal, androgynous Jareth the Goblin Male monarch — a.k.a. the incomparable David Bowie. In 2016, the iconic genre- and gender-bending rock star lost a long battle with liver cancer. His declining health was a well-kept secret, and fans and admirers from all over the earth mourned his untimely passing.
If you believe that Bowie's absence from a Labyrinth sequel is more a casting challenge than a reason to cancel the unabridged projection, I'd recommend that you become back and spotter the original 1986 flick. Bowie's presence extends beyond his insanely flustered hairdo, gigantic codpiece and cool charismatic demeanor — the man also wrote and performed more than than half of the film's soundtrack.
Seeing Bowie perform as Jareth is much like watching him as Ziggy Stardust. It can be challenging to separate the truth from the fiction of these performances, as Bowie becomes so engrossed in his characterization that he simply ceases to be himself. Even as an adult, it's difficult to lookout Jareth the Goblin King prance, dance and sing without occasionally stopping to retrieve, "Wow. That actually is David Bowie. And, yep, I will 'Dance the Magic Dance' down my hallway."
I'm sorry, but it's impossible for a casting director to find a multitalented thespian/musician to fill up Bowie'southward shoes in an upcoming sequel. Information technology's also a claiming to imagine any viable reason why the original — seemingly immortal — Goblin Male monarch would have all of a sudden changed grade. This type of confusion only deepens when considering what might go of the Labyrinth's creatures.
Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, directed the original Labyrinth film. His masterful puppetry showed a depth of skill unmatched by rival puppeteers, and in a fourth dimension without impressive CGI graphics, he was one of the go-to guys for practical special effects. Sadly, Henson passed away in 1990. Since that time, there have been no less than 5 theatrical releases with his mannerly Muppet characters — and they've all been atrocious.
Some might take those movies as a sign that Henson's absence is no big deal when attempting to make a sequel. They would be incredibly wrong. A Labyrinth sequel without Bowie AND Jim Henson would be like a Mrs. Doubtfire sequel without Robin Williams. (Don't you cartel, 20th Century Fox!) Just stop thinking about it and appreciate this magic for what it is!
Making a sequel to the Labyrinth film without using Henson's puppets would be like George Lucas abandoning practical puppetry from his Star Wars franchise in favor of poorly-generated computer graphics. Oh…that's already happened, and the response has been less-than-stellar. Fans who have grown upwardly watching a specific film are bound to feel slighted, misunderstood or simply plain cheated when that film ends up lost in technological translation.
Not convinced that fans don't want a CGI-heavy Labyrinth remake? Take a look at how The Lion King fanbase (and critics) reacted to the CGI "live-activity"' Disney remake. Here'due south a spoiler: They didn't like it.
A Project Fueled past Profits, Non Passions
All of this begs the question, "Why are these executives greenish-lighting so many '80s remakes and sequels right now?" Unfortunately, the respond lies in nostalgia-based turn a profit. Academics have long studied consumer behavior, and information technology seems that contempo studies have not fallen on deaf ears.
In 2014, the Journal of Consumer Research published findings on the connection between nostalgia and money-spending habits. They discovered that people are more willing to spend money when they're feeling sentimental or nostalgic. Ad executives and film producers accept taken this tidbit of information and run with it.
That's why our electric current picture manufacture is flooded with remakes and unasked-for sequels, especially to icons from the 1980s and 1990s. Children from that era are at present full-fledged adults with existential dread about the future as climate change, pandemics and political anarchy leave generations clamoring for familiar, comforting nostalgia.
But rather than re-releasing original footage on updated media (call back Blu-ray and 4K downloads), the film industry would rather take existing intellectual property and rebrand it for the younger generation. In most cases, the result is an alienated original audience and a disinterested youth. This is all done in the name of and for the sake of turn a profit.
And so Delight, Leave This Gem of a Moving-picture show Lone
A moving picture shouldn't exist pre-judged as good or bad, of form, but should instead exist judged by its merit, reception and lasting impact. Nevertheless, even the about avant-garde hologram technology could non revive Bowie's onscreen presence (NOR SHOULD IT). And no amount of CGI could replace the authenticity and wonder of Henson's creations.
The just matter that could remain consistent betwixt the original Labyrinth film and its proposed sequel is its main screenwriter, Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame and glory). But as of this moment, in that location's no word from the crumbling Brit as to his possible involvement in writing a sequel.
Equally a result, there'south little hope that a Labyrinth 2 would exist anything more than than a shameless, soulless cash take hold of aimed at adults who long for the simpler, stranger globe that lay before them during the '80s. Any project based on turn a profit, non passion, is doomed to fail, and that'south why I'thou not looking forward to the mess of a sequel that undoubtedly lies ahead.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/labyrinth-sequel-bad-idea?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "Why Do I Think Bad Thoughts About My Family"
Post a Comment